Safeguarding concerns
A serious concern exists, but evidence, chronology and competing accounts need separating before further findings or escalation.
Threshold is most useful when a concern is moving toward significant action while the evidence picture is fragmented, disputed or incomplete.

A serious concern exists, but evidence, chronology and competing accounts need separating before further findings or escalation.
A complaint, allegation, conduct concern or management issue is moving toward formal action.
A complaint has become serious, recurring or disputed and needs an independent evidence view.
The organisation needs to understand whether the record supports the position being reported or relied upon.
Senior leaders or Boards are being asked to act but the evidence picture is incomplete.
Multiple accounts, documents and actions need structuring before conclusions harden.
A recurring problem is moving from manageable toward significant organisational risk.
A significant intervention, suspension, escalation or contractual decision is being considered.
Use emergency or statutory services.
Report to the appropriate law-enforcement authority where required.
Requires authorised clinical professionals.
Requires appropriately qualified legal advice.
May not justify an independent Threshold review.
Witness Room may be the better ORVIA route.
THRESHOLD · Review before escalation.
Bring us the concern →WITNESS ROOM · Challenge and preparation.
Witness Room →ORVIA OVERSIGHT · Oversight and systemic improvement.
ORVIA Oversight →TRUST SHOULD BE INSPECTABLE
Company registration, external recognition and ORVIA’s own programme are shown separately, so you can see what each one means. Every item links to its source.